Devil May Care

Las Vegas has long courted a controversial and unlawful reputation. Many speakeasies provided entertainment during the prohibition era. In the 1930s it became much easier to get married and divorced there than most other places in the US. The city has a thriving sex work industry despite it having been illegal for a long time. And it is of course famous for its large gambling establishments.

But the city is also known for its history of mafia activity. Gangsters like Bugsy Siegel, Meyer Lansky and other mafia figures played key roles in the development of Las Vegas establishments. This, coupled with the lack of action by police and elected officials, painted Las Vegas as a hotbed of crime and corruption. And while these elements may be less pronounced now the image of Las Vegas as “Sin City” remains largely unchanged.

Soul On Fire

It’s easy to see why filmmakers keep using Las Vegas in their work. Its image of excess presents great visual storytelling opportunities. But it also provides inbuilt possibilities for engaging stories.

Narratively, Las Vegas inherently provides strong forces to pit our protagonist against. Whether our lead is fighting corruption, organised crime (in whatever fashion) or addiction they are automatically up against an enormous challenge because of how historically embedded it is within the city. Las Vegas movies like boxing films centre on huge challenges we can all either sympathise or thematically empathise with.

It is also a great backdrop to create interesting characters. The city’s nature provides a basis to explore people who don’t fit the typical protagonist’s mould. Lead characters can be societally criminalised (mobsters, sex workers etc.) or villainized (people with addictions), making them inherently appealing because of their more realistic nature. And because they are battling against embedded dangerous forces protagonists in Las Vegas films are given a lot of room to showcase their personalities. It allows us to invest more in their struggle if we are attached to their vulnerability or determination.

So what great movies best show off the city’s darker side?

The Lady Gambles

An engrossing character study about how the risk, glamour and community of Las Vegas gambling serve to hook people into a dangerous addiction. It also features a great performance from Barbara Stanwyck.

Kolchak: The Night Stalker

This enjoyable TV horror neo-noir film follows the eponymous reporter trying to find the person (or something else?) responsible for a series of murders. While battling the authorities and his boss at every turn.

Leaving Las Vegas

A self-destructive alcoholic writer and a sex worker seeking genuine connection manage to find kinship but how long will it last? A brutal look at the alienation faced by those with no control over their lives.

Casino

Casino tells the thrilling story of two friends tasked with ensuring that their Las Vegas casino runs smoothly for their mob overlords. But when personal drama threatens the operation’s stability their lives hang in the balance.

Fear and Loathing In Las Vegas

Raoul Duke and his lawyer Dr. Gonzo head to Las Vegas, searching for the American dream. When their engagingly surreal odyssey ends, the American dream is revealed as a lie built on violence and exploitation. Something embodied perfectly by the setting.

Also Read: The Eternal Appeal of the Boxing Movie

The post The Dark Side of Las Vegas on Film appeared first on Big Picture Film Club.

Another film released twenty years ago and very deserving of a retro review is Gangs of New York, Martin Scorsese’s historical gangster epic.

What’s Going On?

The film is set mainly in The Five Points, a very poor area of New York, where the real authorities are the brutal gangs who struggle for supremacy. The film starts with a confrontation between the two broad groups – those who consider themselves real Americans, and those made up of more recent immigrants. This battle ends with victory for the “real” Americans, their leader Bill the Butcher killing the opposition leader, Priest Vallon. Vallon’s son escapes and is brought up by the state until he becomes an adult and returns, using the name Amsterdam, to find that Bill’s gang reigns supreme and many of his father’s old friends have switched sides. He seeks vengeance but pretends that he just wants a place to live and hides his identity. Amsterdam gets close to Bill in order to make his revenge possible but is at times overawed by the man. Inevitably their gang war starts again.

In Front of the Camera

The film has a sensational cast. This was the first film I saw Daniel Day-Lewis, who plays Bill, and gives a strong performance as the almost psychotically violent but charismatic gang-leader. Leonardo DiCaprio plays Amsterdam who is still seen as the guy from Titanic and Romeo + Juliet and this is perhaps where he starts his ascent to Oscar-winning critical acclaim. Incidentally, this is also the first Scorsese film to feature DiCaprio, who would go on to star in four more Scorsese films and will be starring in two yet to be released films.

Cameron Diaz is Jenny Everdeane, a criminal saving up to go to California and the target of many other characters affections. The cast is packed with amazing talent – Jim Broadbent is a powerful and corrupt New York politician, John C. Reilly is Happy Jack – gang member turned police officer, Brendan Gleeson is Monk – a seemingly unaligned legendary streetfighter.

Behind The Scenes

The film is directed by Martin Scorsese who is a titan of 20th and 21st Century filmmaking who has been making masterpieces for around fifty years. Nothing more needs to be said.

The Civil War

The film is set during the American Civil War and for much of the film, this is of absolutely no consequence and stated openly that none of them thought the war would impact them. In the first half of the film, we see the Emancipation Proclamation and newly arrived immigrants signing up to fight but it’s not much of a factor. This changes as the government propose a draft, the first in American history, names will be drawn at random and join the army, with the caveat that you can buy your way out if you’re rich and your name is picked. The unrest of the city caused by the draft builds throughout the film. It also means that there are a lot of soldiers in and around New York City. There is a very real parallel between the savage violence on the streets of New York and the savage violence taking place across the country, where casualties are measured in the hundreds of thousands.

Does It Work?

I have always been a big fan of this film and while it’s not up there with Goodfellas or Raging Bull it’s a great film. Day-Lewis dominates every scene he is in and prowls the set looking for the next person to stab. Bill is no mere thug – he is a leading figure in the community, feted by politicians and the wealthy. DiCaprio’s Amsterdam never quite measures up against him but I don’t think he is meant to. Bill explodes with charisma and showmanship while always maintaining a strong sense of violent menace. When he meets with political leaders he barely alters his behaviour, keeping his ferocity on the surface.

A big theme in this film is how people change. Of those who fought alongside Vallon, Happy Jack is now a police officer who takes orders from Bill, McGloin is part of Bill’s inner circle, Monk, who was always seemingly just a hired fighter, takes a semi-principled stand alongside Amsterdam. The person who doesn’t change is Bill. When he is told repeatedly that times are changing and he needs to change with them he refuses. He keeps the principles that he has, refusing to kill those who are unworthy of a death by his hands, and while he may sometimes wear fancier clothes he has not at all lost his edge. As for Amsterdam revenge has sustained his entire life and is given various opportunities to leave the fight behind and live a genuinely peaceful life and always refuses

The Ending

Spoiler Alert – the film ends with a battle set up between Bill’s gangs and Amsterdam’s. But the battle never happens. Riots have broken out across the city, even extending into the rich parts of town, and the army are called in. As the gang fight is about to begin the area is hit by cannon fire and then soldiers deal with whoever is left. The fight the whole film has built to – between Bill and Amsterdam – doesn’t happen. Sitting in the rubble and covered in the dust both notice that Bill has been impaled by shrapnel and is dying, Amsterdam however decides to speed things up and stabs him, getting whatever measure of revenge he can. A lot of people were unhappy with this ending but I like it. There’s only so much disruption the authorities can allow and sooner or later they will act. I also think this is the only way Amsterdam could have won, like I said, he never seemed to measure up to Bill and a fight where Amsterdam won would have been unsatisfactory.

Rating: (4 / 5)

Also Read: The Many Films of Martin Scorsese

The post Retro Review: Gangs of New York appeared first on Big Picture Film Club.